Structure

Structure

Work-package structure

Six Work Packages (WP)

HARPNET combines scientific work packages with dedicated training, communication and management activities.

WP1

Shared resolution pathways in rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease

WP2

Molecular and cellular mechanisms controlling inflammation resolution

WP3

Bioinformatics, therapeutic development and translational models

WP4

Training, networking and career development

WP5

Communication, dissemination, exploitation and sustainability

WP6

Project coordination and management

Governance structure

Project Coordinator and Project Management Team

HARPNET is coordinated by Professor Jesmond Dalli at Queen Mary University of London. The Project Management Team supports the daily scientific, administrative and financial coordination of the network, communication with the European Commission, consortium reporting and organisation of network activities.

Principal decision-making body

Supervisory Board

The Supervisory Board is the network’s principal decision-making body. It oversees scientific progress, training, supervision, risk management, equality and inclusion, resource allocation and coordination between partners.

Training

Training Board

The Training Board coordinates network-wide training, monitors the individual development of the Doctoral Candidates and ensures complementarity between HARPNET activities and local doctoral programmes.

Impact

Dissemination and Exploitation Board

This board oversees communication, open science, intellectual-property management, dissemination of results and the translation of discoveries into academic, clinical and commercial impact.

External oversight

Scientific Advisory and Thesis Boards

Independent scientific advisers and Thesis Boards will provide external guidance, monitor research quality and support the progression and professional development of individual Doctoral Candidates.

Your Voice

Doctoral Candidate Forum

The Doctoral Candidate Forum gives the researchers a formal voice in network governance. Its representatives will communicate the cohort’s priorities, contribute to decision-making and support the organisation of scientific, training and social activities.

harpnet forum voice